NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (1207MHz vs 990MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q
+52%
6.18 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh
4.055 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jul 2022
Ampere-MW
Generation
GeForce 30 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
682 MHz
Base Clock
622 MHz
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
990 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
16
2560
Shading Units
2048
80
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
80
Tensor Cores
64
20
RT Cores
16
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.68 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
63.36 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.055 TFLOPS
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.055 TFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
63.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.6
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
