Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1207MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 11.23GB/s)
2552 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q +30800%
6.18 TFLOPS
GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
0.02 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2008
Ampere-MW
Generation
GeForce 9M(9000M)
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

682 MHz
Base Clock
-
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.23GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
1
2560
Shading Units
8
80
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.116 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.116 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

95W
TDP
13W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
G98-700-U2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
UMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
80 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.8
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net