NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs AMD FirePro W6170M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1207MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q
+213%
6.18 TFLOPS
FirePro W6170M
1.971 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Aug 2014
Ampere-MW
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
682 MHz
Base Clock
-
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
14
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
896
80
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
16
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Emerald
-
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL
(216-0857001)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
