NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 16GB VRAM Quadro GP100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (1612MHz vs 1442MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Quadro GP100 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
8.253 TFLOPS
Quadro GP100
+25%
10.34 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
RTX A2000 Embedded
+12%
271
Quadro GP100
240
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1117 MHz
Base Clock
1304 MHz
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
1442 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
56
2560
Shading Units
3584
80
TMUs
224
48
ROPs
96
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.4 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
323.0 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
20.67 TFLOPS
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.34 TFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.168 TFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
235W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GP100
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
16 nm
Unknown
Transistors
15.3 billion
Unknown
Die Size
610 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
6.0
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
