NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro 400
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
2512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
+7541%
8.253 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1117 MHz
Base Clock
-
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
6
2560
Shading Units
48
80
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
32W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.486 billion
Unknown
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
