NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 111% (1627MHz vs 771MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
Lower TDP (60W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A1000 Embedded
+87%
6.664 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX A1000 Embedded
+342%
1297
Quadro K5200
293
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1192 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1627 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
2304
64
TMUs
192
48
ROPs
48
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
78.10 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
104.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
6.664 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.664 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
104.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GK110B
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
7.08 billion
Unknown
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
