NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs Moore Threads MTT S2000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
14080 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+755%
91.06 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2022
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
915 MHz
Base Clock
1300 MHz
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
4096
568
TMUs
256
192
ROPs
256
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
AD102
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
Unknown
609 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
