Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 470

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 470

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 0System Shared VRAM Quadro FX 470 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
6128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 470 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +42500%
19.17 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 470
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

720 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
System Shared
GDDR6
Memory Type
System Shared
160bit
Memory Bus
System Shared
280.0GB/s
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

48
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
16
192
TMUs
8
80
ROPs
4
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

124.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.640 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
C79
-
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
-
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
38W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy