Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro W6170M

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro W6170M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
6528 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation +1154%
24.72 TFLOPS
FirePro W6170M
1.971 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Aug 2014
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1290 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

58
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
14
7424
Shading Units
896
232
TMUs
56
80
ROPs
16
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

133.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
386.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
24.72 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
24.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
386.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
Emerald
-
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Board Design

110W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy