NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU
We compared a Desktop platform GPU: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and a Game console GPU: 16GB VRAM Ryzen Z2 Go GPU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (2700MHz vs 2250MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Lower TDP (28W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+455%
23.04 TFLOPS
Ryzen Z2 Go GPU
4.147 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2025
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Console GPU
Desktop
Type
Game console
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
-
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
800 MHz
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
2700 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
LPDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
768
160
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
32
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
12
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
48 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.6 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.294 TFLOPS
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.147 TFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
259.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
28W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
Rembrandt+
-
GPU Variant
100-000001672
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
13.1 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
208 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
