NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 17 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 100W)
Score
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jul 2005
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
-
160
TMUs
12
64
ROPs
8
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
83W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
NV41
-
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
130 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0
