NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 34% (2250MHz vs 1680MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 336.0GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+257%
23.04 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2060
6.451 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2019
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
1365 MHz
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
192bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
40
SM Count
30
5120
Shading Units
1920
160
TMUs
120
64
ROPs
48
160
Tensor Cores
240
40
RT Cores
30
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.64 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
201.6 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.90 TFLOPS
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.451 TFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
201.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
160W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
TU106-200A-KA-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
