NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA NVS 300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
5104 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+58976%
23.04 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
40
SM Count
2
5120
Shading Units
16
160
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
18W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
