Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs Moore Threads MTT S10

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs Moore Threads MTT S10

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM MTT S10 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S10 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Lower TDP (30W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +1025%
23.04 TFLOPS
MTT S10
2.048 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Oct 2023
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1725 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
0 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
40
SM Count
5120
Shading Units
1024
160
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
64
160
Tensor Cores
40
RT Cores
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
64.00 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.048 TFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
30W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
-
GPU Variant
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
294 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
8.9
CUDA
6.7
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net