NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Moore Threads MTT S4000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2130MHz
Lower TDP (70W vs 450W)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
12 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+104%
24.58 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
8192
88
TMUs
512
48
ROPs
512
88
Tensor Cores
128
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
768.0 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
768.0 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
49.15 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.58 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
384.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
450W
250 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
22 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5
