NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+1100%
12 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
800
88
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
