NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+2314%
12 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Nov 2007
Quadro Ada
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
320
88
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
16
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
105W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
RV670
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
