Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (2130MHz vs 1785MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
1408 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 125W)
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +138%
12 TFLOPS
CMP 30HX
5.027 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Feb 2021
Quadro Ada
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
22
-
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
1408
88
TMUs
88
48
ROPs
48
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
TU116
-
GPU Variant
TU116-100-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
125W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy