NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (2130MHz vs 1650MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 185W)
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+57%
12 TFLOPS
CMP 40HX
7.603 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+125%
2649
CMP 40HX
1174
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Feb 2021
Quadro Ada
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
1470 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
36
2816
Shading Units
2304
88
TMUs
144
48
ROPs
64
88
Tensor Cores
288
22
RT Cores
36
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
185W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
