ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X800 GTO AGP and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 115W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 31.36GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon R400 AGP
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2505 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2640 MHz
490 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
31.36GB/s
Bandwidth
216.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
18
-
Shading Units
2560
12
TMUs
80
12
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
120
-
RT Cores
18
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.48 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
211.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
13.52 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
49W
TDP
115W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x Molex
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Processor
R420
GPU Name
AD107
R420 GTO
GPU Variant
-
R400
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.16 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
281 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0b (9_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
-
Shader Model
6.8
