Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI FirePro V3750

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI FirePro V3750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (48W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265 +438%
1.894 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Sep 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
16
Compute Units
4
1024
Shading Units
320
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
RV730
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO (215-0719056)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
48W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy