Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 250XE vs AMD FirePro W9000

AMD Radeon R7 250XE vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250XE and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 250XE 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (80W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250XE
1.101 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000 +262%
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jun 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
32
640
Shading Units
2048
40
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

13.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
34.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1101 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
68.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Tahiti
Cape Verde XT
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
274W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy