AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6400
+115%
3.58 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.658 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon Pro W6400
+143%
3604
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1481
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Radeon Pro W6400
+245%
1644
Radeon Pro WX 3200
476
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jul 2019
Radeon Pro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2331 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
640
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
74.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
111.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
7.161 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
3.580 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
223.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Navi 24
GPU Name
Polaris 23
Navi 24 XL-W
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
6 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
