AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs ATI Radeon X1650
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2007
Radeon Pro
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2331 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
8 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
74.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.540 GPixel/s
111.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.540 GTexel/s
7.161 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.580 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
223.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Navi 24
GPU Name
RV516
Navi 24 XL-W
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
6 nm
Process Size
90 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.105 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0
