AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD FirePro W2100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 243% (2331MHz vs 680MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6400
+722%
3.58 TFLOPS
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon Pro W6400
+966%
3604
FirePro W2100
338
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Aug 2014
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
2331 MHz
Base Clock
630 MHz
2331 MHz
Boost Clock
680 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
74.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.440 GPixel/s
111.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
7.161 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.580 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
435.2 GFLOPS
223.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
27.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
26W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Navi 24
GPU Name
Oland
Navi 24 XL-W
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
