Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1720MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 475W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega II +2528%
14.09 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2019
Release Date
Sep 2008
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
Apple MPX
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1574 MHz
Base Clock
-
1720 MHz
Boost Clock
-
806 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
896MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
448bit
825.3GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
27
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
216
256
TMUs
72
64
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

110.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
440.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
28.18 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.09 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
7.045 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Vega 20
GPU Name
GT200
Vega 20 XT
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Board Design

475W
TDP
182W
850 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy