Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs NVIDIA NVS 2100M

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs NVIDIA NVS 2100M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 16 and 512MB VRAM NVS 2100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (307.2GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 2100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (11W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega 16 +6148%
2.437 TFLOPS
NVS 2100M
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
Jan 2010
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

815 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
1024bit
Memory Bus
64bit
307.2GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
16
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.140 GPixel/s
76.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.280 GTexel/s
4.874 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.437 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
152.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Vega 12
GPU Name
GT218
Vega 12 XLA
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.26 billion
Unknown
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
11W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy