Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs AMD FirePro M8900

AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs AMD FirePro M8900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 560 and 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 560 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
64 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 81.28GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 560 +42%
1.858 TFLOPS
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Apr 2011
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
81.28GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
16
Compute Units
12
1024
Shading Units
960
64
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.76 GPixel/s
58.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.64 GTexel/s
1.858 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.858 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
116.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Polaris 21
GPU Name
Blackcomb
Polaris 21 XT (215-0908004)
GPU Variant
Blackcomb XT GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3 billion
Transistors
1.7 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy