Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile +398%
3.656 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1575 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

60W
TDP
51W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy