NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID K100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 256MB VRAM GRID K100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+1021%
3.656 TFLOPS
GRID K100
0.326 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1575 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
130W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GK107
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
