NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 8GB VRAM Quadro M4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 120W)
NVIDIA Quadro M4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+42%
3.656 TFLOPS
Quadro M4000
2.573 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+39%
3220
Quadro M4000
2305
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+31%
1426
Quadro M4000
1086
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jun 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1575 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
1664
64
TMUs
104
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.47 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
80.39 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.573 TFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
80.39 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
120W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
GM204-850-A1
Turing
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
