NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+766%
3.656 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800M
0.422 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1575 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
16
1024
Shading Units
128
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.20 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM3-B2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
