Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU

We compared a Professional market GPU: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and a Integrated graphics card GPU: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics 96EU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (1785MHz vs 1400MHz)
256 additional rendering cores
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Lower TDP (45W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile +70%
3.656 TFLOPS
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Professional
Type
Integrated
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

1575 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1400 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
System Shared
GDDR5
Memory Type
System Shared
128bit
Memory Bus
System Shared
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.301 TFLOPS
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Alder Lake GT1
-
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.2
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12 nm
Process Size
10 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

60W
TDP
45W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy