NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (1785MHz vs 1687MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile
+136%
8.637 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3.656 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A2000 Mobile
+52%
4917
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3220
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
RTX A2000 Mobile
+98%
2836
Quadro T2000 Mobile
1426
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
May 2019
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1215 MHz
Base Clock
1575 MHz
1687 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
16
2560
Shading Units
1024
80
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
80.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
8.637 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
8.637 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
135.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
