Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and 2GB VRAM GRID M60 2Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 38% (1620MHz vs 1178MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +209%
14.93 TFLOPS
GRID M60 2Q
4.825 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1230 MHz
Base Clock
557 MHz
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

72
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
4608
Shading Units
2048
288
TMUs
128
96
ROPs
64
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

155.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.39 GPixel/s
466.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.8 GTexel/s
29.86 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.93 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.825 TFLOPS
466.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
150.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GM204
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Board Design

260W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy