Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K80 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

NVIDIA Tesla K80 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Tesla K80 and 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 97% (1620MHz vs 824MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 240.6GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (260W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K80
4.113 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +262%
14.93 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2014
Release Date
Aug 2018
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

562 MHz
Base Clock
1230 MHz
824 MHz
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
240.6GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
72
-
Compute Units
-
2496
Shading Units
4608
208
TMUs
288
48
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

42.85 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
155.5 GPixel/s
171.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
466.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.86 TFLOPS
4.113 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.93 TFLOPS
1371 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
466.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK210
GPU Name
TU102
GK210-885-A1
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.1 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
260W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.7
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy