Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (1545MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 4000 +724%
7.119 TFLOPS
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1005 MHz
Base Clock
1058 MHz
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
416.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

36
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
384
144
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
16
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
222.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.98 GTexel/s
14.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.119 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
222.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
GM107
TU104-850-A1
GPU Variant
GM107-850-A2
Turing
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

160W
TDP
45W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy