NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 and 96GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 450W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (1550MHz vs 1354MHz)
More VRAM (96GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (2458GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
13824 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P620
1.386 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1350
+3106%
44.44 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1266 MHz
Base Clock
750 MHz
1354 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1252 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
96GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
80.13GB/s
Bandwidth
2458GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
14336
32
TMUs
896
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
896
-
RT Cores
112
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.66 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
43.33 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1389 GTexel/s
21.66 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
44.44 TFLOPS
1386 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.44 TFLOPS
43.33 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.44 TFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
450W
200 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
14 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
100 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
