NVIDIA Quadro P4000 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro P4000 and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 39% (2050MHz vs 1480MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 243.3GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P4000
5.304 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+216%
16.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1202 MHz
Base Clock
1950 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1901 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
243.3GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
1792
Shading Units
4096
112
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
94.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
165.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
82.88 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
5.304 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
165.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
105W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
DG2-512
GP104-850-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
6 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
