NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla K20X
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20X 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2.974 TFLOPS
Tesla K20X
+32%
3.935 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
-
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
9
SM Count
-
1152
Shading Units
2688
72
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
235W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GK110
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
