NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 13% (1455MHz vs 1291MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2.974 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
+350%
13.41 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro P2000 Mobile
231
Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
+1171%
2937
OctaneBench
Quadro P2000 Mobile
54
Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
+557%
355
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Sep 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Turing-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
1275 MHz
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
9
SM Count
72
1152
Shading Units
4608
72
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.7 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
419.0 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
26.82 TFLOPS
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.41 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
419.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
TU102
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
