NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+29%
2.974 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
-
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
9
SM Count
-
1152
Shading Units
1536
72
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
