Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 16GB VRAM Quadro GP100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Quadro GP100 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 31% (1442MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
Quadro GP100 +635%
10.34 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro M2000M
34
Quadro GP100 +605%
240
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1304 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
1442 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
56
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
3584
40
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.4 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
323.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.67 TFLOPS
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.34 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.168 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GP100
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
15.3 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
610 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
235W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
6.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy