Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630

NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630

We compared a Professional market GPU: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and a Integrated graphics card GPU: 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics 630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
200 additional rendering cores
Intel UHD Graphics 630 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1150MHz vs 1124MHz)
Lower TDP (15W vs 45W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620 +104%
0.863 TFLOPS
UHD Graphics 630
0.423 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Apr 2020
Quadro
Generation
HD Graphics
Professional
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
350 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
System Shared
DDR3
Memory Type
System Shared
128bit
Memory Bus
System Shared
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
184
24
TMUs
23
16
ROPs
3
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.450 GPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.45 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
846.4 GFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
423.2 GFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
105.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
Comet Lake GT2
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 9.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm+++
1.87 billion
Transistors
Unknown
148 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

45W
TDP
15W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy