NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 5GB)
1024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 94% (1493MHz vs 771MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.2GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro P2200
+7%
3.822 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro K5200
2072
Quadro P2200
+64%
3410
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro K5200
941
Quadro P2200
+63%
1536
Blender
Quadro K5200
293
Quadro P2200
+9%
322
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jun 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1493 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
256bit
Memory Bus
160bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
200.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
10
2304
Shading Units
1280
192
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.72 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
119.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
59.72 GFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.822 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
119.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GP106
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
