Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2272 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200 +4341%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
32
192
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy