NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
2256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+3189%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Apr 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
2304
Shading Units
48
192
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
