NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 180W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 125% (1733MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.5GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro P5000
+149%
8.873 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro K5200
2072
Quadro P5000
+205%
6335
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro K5200
941
Quadro P5000
+208%
2900
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
1607 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1733 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
288.5GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
2304
Shading Units
2560
192
TMUs
160
48
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.9 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
277.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
138.6 GFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.873 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
277.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
180W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GP104
-
GPU Variant
GP104-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
