NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Tesla M4
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 4GB VRAM Tesla M4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla M4 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 39% (1072MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+61%
3.553 TFLOPS
Tesla M4
2.195 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro K5200
2072
Tesla M4
+156%
5323
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro K5200
941
Tesla M4
+152%
2375
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Nov 2015
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
872 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1072 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
88.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
1024
192
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
34.30 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.61 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.195 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
68.61 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GM206
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
