NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro GV100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 32GB VRAM Quadro GV100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro GV100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 111% (1627MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (868.4GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro GV100
+368%
16.66 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro K5200
2072
Quadro GV100
+485%
12132
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro K5200
941
Quadro GV100
+573%
6340
Blender
Quadro K5200
293
Quadro GV100
+579%
1992
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Volta
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
1132 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
848 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
868.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
80
2304
Shading Units
5120
192
TMUs
320
48
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
208.3 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
520.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.32 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.66 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.330 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GV100
-
GPU Variant
GV100-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
